I thought things would be in a doldrums mode for awhile, from the time I finished writing the book until the day it's released.
But noooooo... Far from it. Things have been surprisingly interesting.
Last week, for example, I got a call saying that a group calling itself "Friends and Supporters of Father Robinson" posted a notice in the church bulletin for St. Hedwig's and St. Adalbert's -- the parishes are "twinned" and have the same pastor and share a bulletin -- about a chicken-dinner fund-raiser they are planning for Father Robinson on Oct. 8.
Mike Drabik, a parishioner, wrote to the bishop to complain about a diocesan church using its resources to help a convicted nun-killer raise money. Father Michael Billian, episcopal vicar, immediately responded by saying the diocese had told them NOT to run the ad.
I got copies of the email correspondence between Mr. Drabik and Father Billian, and a comment from local SNAP leader Claudia Vercellotti, and I wrote a story for The Blade that ran Wednesday at the top of Page 1.
Nobody is complaining about Robinson supporters raising money for the priest's defense fund. The problem is that they're using church property and resources to do it. If they do it on their own, outside of the church, that would be fine.
The priest obviously has the right to appeal the guilty verdict. I wish him the best, I really do. He ought to pursue the justice system as far as it will take him. But the Toledo diocese did not pay his attorney fees in his Lucas County Common Pleas Court murder trial and it has nothing to do with the appeal. By running announcements in parish bulletins, it falsely implies that the diocese is condoning the fund-raiser.
Not surprisingly, when I tried to find out who placed the bulletin ad, the church secretary wouldn't comment. Father Marek Ciesla, pastor, who normally is very responsive and who I consider to be a godly man, did not return my calls. I have a feeling the church secretary was the culprit, but whoever is responsible is not 'fessing up. I doubt the diocese will explore this any further unless, God forfend, another bulletin ad pops up somewhere.
In addition to the bulletin item, incidentally, the priest's supporters posted a flyer on the bulletin board. Mr. Drabik found it particularly insulting because the Robinson chicken dinner flyer was hanging above a poster announcing a Right-to-Life event.
People often ask me why we still call Father Robinson a priest. Well, the way the Roman Catholic Church functions, once a priest is ordained he is a priest for life, even if he has committed a heinous crime. While Robinson has been barred from ministry, meaning he cannot present himself as a priest to the public or perform any sacraments or Mass except for himself, he is technically still an ordained Catholic priest. He also has retired, quietly, but that does not end his ordination.
The only way a priest loses that status is if the Vatican laicizes him. This normally is done at the request of a priest, usually when he wants to leave the priesthood and get married. In rare cases, it can be initiated by the church. IMO (in my opinion), a priest convicted of murdering a nun would be such a case. But the Vatican is slow to move.
I saw Alan Konop and his wife, Barbara, at the Taste of Diversity last weekend in Toledo Botanical Garden. Alan is one of the finest lawyers around and a genuinely good person. I don't know why he chose to defend Father Robinson, but I felt sad for him and the other defense attorneys -- John Thebes, Nicole Khoury, and Jack Callahan -- when the priest was found guilty. Alan and team had worked hard and they raised all the right points in the priest's defense. But obviously it wasn't enough to persuade the jury to rule him innocent.
Alan asked me what I thought was the key evidence in the trial, and even though there was a lot, if you wanted to get to the crux of it all, I told him it was the three witnesses.
"You mean the ones who turned up late?" Alan asked.
True, the trio showed up late, relatively speaking, in the investigation. But when they showed up, their testimony was overwhelming. They said they saw Robinson outside the chapel doors around the time of the murder. Robinson had asserted all along that he never left his room at Mercy Hospital under after he got a call that Sister Margaret Ann had been killed.
Something didn't add up, and you had three people -- one of them a medical doctor -- saying one thing and the priest, who had admitted he lied to police in 1980, saying something else.
I once was involved in an accident, hit by a drunk driver (after a Madonna concert, but let's not get into that. I was working as a music critic). I gave the police my story, and the other guy, separately, gave his. Afterward, the policeman told me there was a great discrepancy but added, "I've been at this job a long time and I know who to believe".
Jurors didn't believe Father Robinson's alibi. They knew who to believe.
Sept. 23, 2006. Sylvania, Ohio