Catholic update
OK, first of all, I've been lagging behind on my blog and I apologize. Times have been hectic. I took a week off the first week of July and worked 14 hours a day on home repairs and redecorating. Funny but I never knew how to fix anything like that until I went on mission trips. My father was not one to pick up a hammer or screwdriver and fix things. But when I went to Denmark and to post-Katrina Mississippi, I worked on some construction projects alongside people who know what they're doing and I picked up a lot. One thing about me, I'm a fast learner. So that week I was able to put some of that mission experience to work in my own backyard, so to speak.
As you may know, we've got a wedding in the family coming up next month and so that is a real motivator to get projects done. Dana, my oldest daughter, is getting married Aug. 25 and so we wanted to spruce up the house and make some of the long-delayed repairs. And once I got back to work, it took me a while to catch up on the voluminous email, voice mail, and snail mail, plus all my regular duties at work and home. And on top of that, I managed to play a few rounds of golf and go to see Bob Dylan at the Toledo Zoo (here's the concert review).
I was under the gun to get a story done about the 5-year anniversary of the Catholic clerical So I hope to be more faithful to the blog. Lots has happened in the last few weeks.
* * *
Starting with the most current Catholic news, I wrote an article published yesterday rounding up the five years of events since July 15, 2002, when Jeff Anderson came to Toledo and announced a lawsuit against the Toledo diocese. Anderson has filed more than 2,000 lawsuits against Catholic dioceses nationwide, and feels that the Toledo diocese has been "intransigent" in dealing with abuse victims. Here is a link to yesterday's article.
The article really just touches the surface of this issue, as I tried to focus on the significant developments. There really was so much more that has gone on. Interesting as far as timing, the news broke over the weekend that the L.A. diocese is paying more than $600 million to victims, averaging more than $1 million per person. The Toledo diocese paid a total of $1.19 million to 23 victims, and around the same time as those settlements were reached in August, 2004, the diocese moved $118 million of investments out of Toledo and into Detroit brokerages. So it's not like they could claim poverty.
Money is not the only issue but, as attorney Catherine Hoolahan told me, criminal prosecution is impossible because of the statutes of limitations, so the only way victims can get any justice is through civil lawsuits and financial compensation. It will never take away the pain and lifelong trauma of the childhood sexual abuse, but it is at least something that the church has to provide to victims, and it may help their situation by allowing them to pay for counseling, or whatever the victims need it for. The settlements are symbolic of the church validating the victim's allegations, which previously had been shrugged off as insignificant or not worthy of the church's attention.
One reason the California settlements are so much larger is because the state's law opening a "look-back" window on old abuse cases, well beyond the statute of limitations. That was proposed in Ohio but the bishops lobbied against it and eventually killed it. The argument was that it was unconstitutional, but it has passed muster in California and last week Delaware approved a similar look-back window. In reality, it had the potential to cost the Catholic church a lot of money, which seems to me to be the primary reason the bishops worked so hard to defeat it. The constitutionality question does not ring true in light of California's passage of such a window.
* * *
Father Tom Leyland is now retired, despite the best efforts of his supporters at St. Rose Parish in Perrysburg, Ohio. The priest said he was being forced into retirement against his will by Toledo Bishop Leonard Blair because he had publicly criticized the bishop over the creation of a neighboring parish that cut into St. Rose's boundaries. The bishop denies any punishment and says it was a routine personnel move. Fr. Leyland was given the opportunity to transfer to another parish but chose to retire instead. Many parishioners rallied in support to keep him, getting 1,500 signatures on a petition. But the bishop was not persuaded, and Leyland retired July 1.
And then, his successor at St. Rose, Father David Nuss, decided not to accept the assignment "for personal reasons." Wonder what that's all about? Very strange. A priest does not turn down an assignment like this unless there's some overriding concerns. I have a good idea what's going on with Father Nuss but I can't report it here. I'll be keeping an eye on the situation and will let you know if/when the truth comes out.
* * *
This week I am working on an article about Pope Benedict XVI's statement calling all denominations besides Catholicism "wounded" or "defective." Whatever his rationale, this statement has caused more ill will than almost anything the Pope has done since taking office, except perhaps his criticism of Islam as being a religion imposed by the sword.
* * *
Thanks for sticking with me during my brief hiatus. I'm back and determined to blog away on a more regular basis.
Toledo, Ohio, July 16, 2007
