The debate over Dottie Zimmerman, the Toledo woman who channels St. Padre Pio, still goes on.
I'm glad to see people discussing the issue but I hope they realize that I don't necessarily agree with or condone everything I write about.
It's a big world of religion out there and I write for a mainstream newspaper, not a Christian periodical. I think I need to cover topics occasionally that are controversial and/or offbeat, although I wouldn't do so too frequently. All in perspective.
The practice of channeling dead people is as old as humanity; the real point of contention for most people about the article is that Mrs. Zimmerman was teaching religion at a Catholic school (she just retired).
Incidentally, in a sidebar article, I quoted a Toledo priest, who was speaking for the diocese, who said that each case of channeling would have to be reviewed individually before any pronouncements were made. So he did not immediately condemn Mrs. Zimmerman for channeling and I think that irked many people.
===============

Here's today's letter:

Church does not condone divination
This is in response to the writer of "Talking with spirits is devilish practice" in the July 28 Readers' Forum. Divination is not a practice that the Catholic church accepts or promotes. The catechism of the Catholic church clearly states, "All forms of divination are to be rejected." It goes on to say, "They contradict the honor, respect, and loving fear that we owe to God alone."

The writer assumed too much from the article and should have done a little more research before he wrote. I believe that his wrath should have been directed more toward Blade religion editor David Yonke for thinking that this was something worth printing. He cast his story in a way that it is legitimate religion. I, as a Catholic, would not condone such practices (divination or channeling), and neither would anyone who is in a "Jesus-centered church."

The church speaks for itself. All one has to do is listen.

Thomas E. Rawlins

Glenbrook Drive